Usage, not quality
Rankings count completed scoring jobs with a recorded model ID. They do not measure accuracy.
LIVE PRODUCTION USAGE
See which models scored jobs, their recorded volume, and provider reliability.
THIS WINDOW
Ranked by recorded completed jobs.
Loading completed scores…
FROM PRODUCTION RECEIPTS
Daily completed scoring jobs by model.
Dates reflect queue-record updates, not necessarily provider completion times.
RECORDED MODEL ACTIVITY
Click a model for its evidence details or select two to compare.
| Rank | Model | Completed jobs | Share | Status | 7-day trend | Last used | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading verified scoring data… | |||||||
Active: 24 hours. Recent: 7 days. Past: older. Trends compare consecutive 7-day periods.
SIDE BY SIDE
Compare recorded usage, not accuracy.
Choose two different models to compare their recorded production history.
Models scored different jobs, so this is not a quality comparison.
MODEL ROTATION
When each model was first and last used, and which models took over its work.
| Model | First used | Last used | Status | Replaced by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | ||||
OPERATIONAL RELIABILITY
First-attempt success, retries and failures by class, per provider. Failure records identify the provider, not the model, so there are no per-model failure rates.
Loading provider receipts…
EVIDENCE
METHODOLOGY & LIMITS
Rankings count completed scoring jobs with a recorded model ID. They do not measure accuracy.
We show the selected model ID. Automatic routes without a confirmed model remain unresolved.
Provider success uses recorded first attempts. Failures cannot reliably be assigned to individual models.
Models scored different jobs. This page cannot determine which produces better matches.
Reliable model-level cost and latency data is unavailable.
Counts include historical scoring activity, not just jobs currently open.